The question to ask when viewing A Question of Adultery is not "was adultery committed?" but "just who were they trying to fool with this movie?" Question would have the viewer believe that it's an "issue" film, something that belongs in the canon of Stanley Kramer films. The difference is that Kramer actually has something to say, and even in those instances where his concern with his message causes him to fudge on his duties as a filmmaker, Kramer is sincere in his dedication to his cause. It's hard to believe that the creators of Question had anything in mind really, other than using the setup to make a film that would attract interest due to its (for the time) controversial subject matter and "frank" dialogue. The writers have created a screenplay that lacks credibility, skirts the "issues" it raises without delving into them, and provides characters that are cardboard through and through. Matters are not helped by Don Chaffey's off-key direction, which can't even stir up fireworks in the climactic trial scenes. The cast is generally much better, although they are hampered by the writing and directing, especially Anthony Steel, who becomes increasingly irritating. Julie London fares much better, creating the only real interest in the movie. It's not a great performance, but it works, which is more than can be said about the film as a whole.
by Craig Butler
review
